<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1748 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275337</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the decision to restrict the disallowance under section 14A to Rs. 8,01,136, aligning with previous rulings. The tribunal confirmed the relief granted by the CIT(A) and dismissed the appeal while partly allowing the Cross Objection. The principle that disallowance under section 14A should not exceed the exempt income earned by the assessee was emphasized, based on specific circumstances and legal precedents cited in similar cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2018 07:31:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536245" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1748 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275337</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the decision to restrict the disallowance under section 14A to Rs. 8,01,136, aligning with previous rulings. The tribunal confirmed the relief granted by the CIT(A) and dismissed the appeal while partly allowing the Cross Objection. The principle that disallowance under section 14A should not exceed the exempt income earned by the assessee was emphasized, based on specific circumstances and legal precedents cited in similar cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275337</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>