https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275323 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to quash the dismissal of Bagchi, ruling that the extension of his service under Rule 75(a) was illegal. The Court found that the government's conduct of the enquiry violated Article 235 of the Constitution, affirming the High Court's exclusive control over disciplinary matters concerning district judges. The State of West Bengal's appeal was dismissed without costs awarded. en-us Fri, 10 Sep 1965 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Sep 2018 14:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275323 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to quash the dismissal of Bagchi, ruling that the extension of his service under Rule 75(a) was illegal. The Court found that the government's conduct of the enquiry violated Article 235 of the Constitution, affirming the High Court's exclusive control over disciplinary matters concerning district judges. The State of West Bengal's appeal was dismissed without costs awarded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 10 Sep 1965 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275323