https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275322 Section 17(2) bars practice in Indian medicine by persons without recognised qualifications, and Section 17(3) is a transitional protection limited to those who were already enrolled, enjoyed existing statutory privileges, or had been practising for the requisite period at the Act's commencement. That protection does not extend to persons who obtained the disputed Hindi Sahitya Sammelan, Prayag qualification after the Act came into force. The public notice restraining unqualified practice was therefore upheld, and the adequacy of the institution's educational standards was treated as a policy matter outside judicial interference. en-us Fri, 17 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Sep 2018 14:40:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275322 Section 17(2) bars practice in Indian medicine by persons without recognised qualifications, and Section 17(3) is a transitional protection limited to those who were already enrolled, enjoyed existing statutory privileges, or had been practising for the requisite period at the Act's commencement. That protection does not extend to persons who obtained the disputed Hindi Sahitya Sammelan, Prayag qualification after the Act came into force. The public notice restraining unqualified practice was therefore upheld, and the adequacy of the institution's educational standards was treated as a policy matter outside judicial interference. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 17 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275322