<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (10) TMI 408 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275322</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Delhi High Court&#039;s decision regarding the recognition of Ayurvedic degrees awarded by Hindi Sahitya Sammelan Prayag. The Court clarified that Section 17(3) of the Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970 protected practitioners registered before the Act&#039;s enforcement, not those acquiring degrees post-1967. The judgment emphasized legislative intent to safeguard existing practitioners&#039; rights, dismissing writ petitions challenging the public notice. The Court highlighted that educational standards and expertise in Indian Medicine are regulated by relevant authorities, affirming limitations on practicing with unrecognized degrees. The appeals were dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2018 14:40:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536168" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (10) TMI 408 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275322</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Delhi High Court&#039;s decision regarding the recognition of Ayurvedic degrees awarded by Hindi Sahitya Sammelan Prayag. The Court clarified that Section 17(3) of the Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970 protected practitioners registered before the Act&#039;s enforcement, not those acquiring degrees post-1967. The judgment emphasized legislative intent to safeguard existing practitioners&#039; rights, dismissing writ petitions challenging the public notice. The Court highlighted that educational standards and expertise in Indian Medicine are regulated by relevant authorities, affirming limitations on practicing with unrecognized degrees. The appeals were dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275322</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>