<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1641 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367905</link>
    <description>The Court declined jurisdiction to address IT glitches in the GST portal, directing the petitioner to utilize the IT-Grievance Redressal Mechanism per Circular No. 39/13/2018-GST. The petitioner withdrew the writ petition to pursue resolution through this mechanism, with the Court allowing the withdrawal without expressing opinions on the mechanism&#039;s authority. The matter now lies with the IT-Grievance Redressal Mechanism, as per the discretion of the GST Council.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2018 06:50:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536120" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1641 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367905</link>
      <description>The Court declined jurisdiction to address IT glitches in the GST portal, directing the petitioner to utilize the IT-Grievance Redressal Mechanism per Circular No. 39/13/2018-GST. The petitioner withdrew the writ petition to pursue resolution through this mechanism, with the Court allowing the withdrawal without expressing opinions on the mechanism&#039;s authority. The matter now lies with the IT-Grievance Redressal Mechanism, as per the discretion of the GST Council.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367905</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>