<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1637 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367901</link>
    <description>The court set aside the impugned assessment order for the year 2013-2014 and remitted the matter back to the first respondent for a fresh consideration of both parties&#039; applications under Rule 13 to ensure a fair and lawful decision-making process. The discrepancies in treatment of similar issues in assessment years 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 compared to 2013-2014, along with the Tribunal&#039;s intervention leading to a re-calculation of royalty payments, highlighted the need for consistency and fair consideration of objections in the assessment process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2018 18:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1637 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367901</link>
      <description>The court set aside the impugned assessment order for the year 2013-2014 and remitted the matter back to the first respondent for a fresh consideration of both parties&#039; applications under Rule 13 to ensure a fair and lawful decision-making process. The discrepancies in treatment of similar issues in assessment years 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 compared to 2013-2014, along with the Tribunal&#039;s intervention leading to a re-calculation of royalty payments, highlighted the need for consistency and fair consideration of objections in the assessment process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367901</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>