https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367899 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, holding that the Department could not recover the tax amount from the petitioner when the employer had deducted it but not deposited it with the Government. Citing relevant statutory provisions and case law, the court emphasized the petitioner's entitlement to credit for the tax deducted at source by the employer. The Department was directed to return any recovery or adjustment made from the petitioner's refunds in later years, along with statutory interest, affirming the petitioner's right to the benefit of tax deducted at source. en-us Mon, 24 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Sep 2018 18:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367899 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, holding that the Department could not recover the tax amount from the petitioner when the employer had deducted it but not deposited it with the Government. Citing relevant statutory provisions and case law, the court emphasized the petitioner's entitlement to credit for the tax deducted at source by the employer. The Department was directed to return any recovery or adjustment made from the petitioner's refunds in later years, along with statutory interest, affirming the petitioner's right to the benefit of tax deducted at source. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 24 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367899