<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1632 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367896</link>
    <description>The High Court partially allowed the appeal, ruling against the assessee on the deduction under Section 80HHC. The issue of excluding gross receipts from business profits was remanded to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration in line with a Supreme Court decision. The Court also directed a fresh consideration of the deduction under Section 40(a)(iia) for wealth tax paid on specific assets.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2018 06:50:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536111" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1632 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367896</link>
      <description>The High Court partially allowed the appeal, ruling against the assessee on the deduction under Section 80HHC. The issue of excluding gross receipts from business profits was remanded to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration in line with a Supreme Court decision. The Court also directed a fresh consideration of the deduction under Section 40(a)(iia) for wealth tax paid on specific assets.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367896</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>