<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1614 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367878</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, ruling that the delay in filing quarterly returns was justified by reasonable causes, namely delayed TDS remittance and ignorance of the law, negating the need for penalty under Section 272A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found the appellant&#039;s explanations plausible and distinguished penal provisions for delayed TDS remittance, ultimately concluding that the penalty was unwarranted in this instance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2018 17:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536093" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1614 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367878</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, ruling that the delay in filing quarterly returns was justified by reasonable causes, namely delayed TDS remittance and ignorance of the law, negating the need for penalty under Section 272A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found the appellant&#039;s explanations plausible and distinguished penal provisions for delayed TDS remittance, ultimately concluding that the penalty was unwarranted in this instance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367878</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>