https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367872 The Tribunal dismissed the petition, ruling that the petitioner was not a member of the company due to the forfeiture of his shares for non-payment. As a result, he lacked standing to invoke Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956. The decision did not impact the petitioner's police complaint, and no costs were awarded. en-us Thu, 02 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Sep 2018 06:48:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367872 The Tribunal dismissed the petition, ruling that the petitioner was not a member of the company due to the forfeiture of his shares for non-payment. As a result, he lacked standing to invoke Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956. The decision did not impact the petitioner's police complaint, and no costs were awarded. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 02 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367872