<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1605 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367869</link>
    <description>The High Court addressed the petitioner&#039;s grievances regarding the revaluation of goods in the bill of entry by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI). The Court allowed the petitioner to apply for provisional release of the goods, with conditions and appeal options outlined. The respondent was directed to ensure investigations primarily took place in New Delhi, with adequate notice required for questioning outside Delhi. The writ petition was disposed of, clarifying the petitioner&#039;s rights in seeking provisional release, appealing decisions, and ensuring investigations did not inconvenience the petitioner&#039;s representatives.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2019 10:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536084" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1605 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367869</link>
      <description>The High Court addressed the petitioner&#039;s grievances regarding the revaluation of goods in the bill of entry by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI). The Court allowed the petitioner to apply for provisional release of the goods, with conditions and appeal options outlined. The respondent was directed to ensure investigations primarily took place in New Delhi, with adequate notice required for questioning outside Delhi. The writ petition was disposed of, clarifying the petitioner&#039;s rights in seeking provisional release, appealing decisions, and ensuring investigations did not inconvenience the petitioner&#039;s representatives.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367869</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>