<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1591 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367855</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for condonation of delay and subsequently dismissed the appeal due to a significant delay of 467 days in filing the appeal. The reasons provided by the appellant, including staff illness and fundraising challenges, were deemed insufficient to justify the delay. The Tribunal found that these explanations did not warrant condonation of the delay, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2018 06:47:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536070" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1591 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367855</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for condonation of delay and subsequently dismissed the appeal due to a significant delay of 467 days in filing the appeal. The reasons provided by the appellant, including staff illness and fundraising challenges, were deemed insufficient to justify the delay. The Tribunal found that these explanations did not warrant condonation of the delay, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367855</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>