<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1590 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367854</link>
    <description>Refund claims could not be rejected without a prior show cause notice setting out the proposed grounds of disallowance, because the claimant was entitled to meet those grounds before any adverse decision. A personal hearing did not cure the absence of notice. The denial of refund in these circumstances breached natural justice and was unsustainable, so the rejection was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2018 06:47:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536069" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1590 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367854</link>
      <description>Refund claims could not be rejected without a prior show cause notice setting out the proposed grounds of disallowance, because the claimant was entitled to meet those grounds before any adverse decision. A personal hearing did not cure the absence of notice. The denial of refund in these circumstances breached natural justice and was unsustainable, so the rejection was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367854</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>