<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1578 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367842</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants on various issues related to liability under Section 11D of the Central Excise Act, eligibility for Cenvat credit on molasses, other inputs/services, and reversal of credit under Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules. The demand under Section 11D was set aside, confirming eligibility for Cenvat credit on in-house and purchased molasses, as well as other inputs/services. The appellants were directed to comply with specific reversal requirements under Rule 6(3) for different time periods. Penalties were set aside due to the absence of intentional evasion. The appeal was disposed of clarifying Cenvat credit eligibility and credit reversal rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2018 18:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536057" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1578 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367842</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants on various issues related to liability under Section 11D of the Central Excise Act, eligibility for Cenvat credit on molasses, other inputs/services, and reversal of credit under Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules. The demand under Section 11D was set aside, confirming eligibility for Cenvat credit on in-house and purchased molasses, as well as other inputs/services. The appellants were directed to comply with specific reversal requirements under Rule 6(3) for different time periods. Penalties were set aside due to the absence of intentional evasion. The appeal was disposed of clarifying Cenvat credit eligibility and credit reversal rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367842</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>