<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1576 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367840</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and restoring the original authority&#039;s decision. It held that under the GST regime, pending refund claims should be paid in cash, irrespective of the nature of the refund. The Tribunal emphasized that any other interpretation would unfairly deprive the assessee of their entitled refund. The Miscellaneous Application for stay of the order was also disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2019 14:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536055" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1576 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367840</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and restoring the original authority&#039;s decision. It held that under the GST regime, pending refund claims should be paid in cash, irrespective of the nature of the refund. The Tribunal emphasized that any other interpretation would unfairly deprive the assessee of their entitled refund. The Miscellaneous Application for stay of the order was also disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367840</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>