<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1572 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367836</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned orders and ruling that interest and penalties did not survive. The demand in the Malkapur unit was found not to survive due to incomplete consideration of the cost audit report by DPA, showing net excess payment. Consequently, demands in Jeedimetla and Balanagar units also did not survive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2018 06:45:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536051" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1572 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367836</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned orders and ruling that interest and penalties did not survive. The demand in the Malkapur unit was found not to survive due to incomplete consideration of the cost audit report by DPA, showing net excess payment. Consequently, demands in Jeedimetla and Balanagar units also did not survive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367836</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>