<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1567 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367831</link>
    <description>BIAPPA was held not to be an authority equivalent to a municipality or cantonment board for determining whether the lands were urban land, and the Tribunal followed its earlier decisions in the assessees&#039; own and related co-owner matters. It also held that the substituted wording in section 2(14)(iii)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, introduced from 01.04.2014, could not be applied retrospectively to assessment year 2007-08. Applying the law relevant to that year, the distance from BBMP limits had to be measured by road rather than by aerial distance. On that basis, the lands were treated as agricultural land and not as urban land exigible to wealth-tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2018 06:42:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536046" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1567 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367831</link>
      <description>BIAPPA was held not to be an authority equivalent to a municipality or cantonment board for determining whether the lands were urban land, and the Tribunal followed its earlier decisions in the assessees&#039; own and related co-owner matters. It also held that the substituted wording in section 2(14)(iii)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, introduced from 01.04.2014, could not be applied retrospectively to assessment year 2007-08. Applying the law relevant to that year, the distance from BBMP limits had to be measured by road rather than by aerial distance. On that basis, the lands were treated as agricultural land and not as urban land exigible to wealth-tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367831</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>