<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1609 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275301</link>
    <description>Service tax on commission paid to foreign agents for procuring export orders was held not sustainable because the services were treated as connected with textile processing and covered by Notification No. 14/2004-ST dated 10.09.2004. The Tribunal followed its earlier view in the assessee&#039;s own case involving export of yarn, applying the same exemption reasoning and holding that the demand beyond the relevant date could not be sustained. The impugned orders were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2018 06:41:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536038" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1609 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275301</link>
      <description>Service tax on commission paid to foreign agents for procuring export orders was held not sustainable because the services were treated as connected with textile processing and covered by Notification No. 14/2004-ST dated 10.09.2004. The Tribunal followed its earlier view in the assessee&#039;s own case involving export of yarn, applying the same exemption reasoning and holding that the demand beyond the relevant date could not be sustained. The impugned orders were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275301</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>