<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1747 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275306</link>
    <description>Amended Section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 applies to pending Section 34 challenges where the arbitral proceedings had already concluded before the amendment, and the earlier deemed stay does not continue merely because the challenge was still pending; a separate stay application is required. Execution cannot proceed against any portion of an award that has already been set aside and remanded, because that part is no longer executable. The award also does not need transmission like a civil court decree for execution in another forum, but that does not revive enforcement for the remanded portion. The garnishee order was therefore unsustainable only to the extent it covered the non-executable items.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2018 06:41:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536033" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1747 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275306</link>
      <description>Amended Section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 applies to pending Section 34 challenges where the arbitral proceedings had already concluded before the amendment, and the earlier deemed stay does not continue merely because the challenge was still pending; a separate stay application is required. Execution cannot proceed against any portion of an award that has already been set aside and remanded, because that part is no longer executable. The award also does not need transmission like a civil court decree for execution in another forum, but that does not revive enforcement for the remanded portion. The garnishee order was therefore unsustainable only to the extent it covered the non-executable items.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>