<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 1266 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275293</link>
    <description>The Members allowed the appeals against Order-in-Original No.8/2006, setting aside the impugned order due to shortcomings related to limitation, non-issuance of show cause notice, clubbing of clearances, and denial of cross-examination. The matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for a fresh consideration, emphasizing adherence to principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2018 18:22:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536018" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 1266 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275293</link>
      <description>The Members allowed the appeals against Order-in-Original No.8/2006, setting aside the impugned order due to shortcomings related to limitation, non-issuance of show cause notice, clubbing of clearances, and denial of cross-examination. The matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for a fresh consideration, emphasizing adherence to principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275293</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>