https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275291 A pre-emption claim must be supported by a subsisting right and remedy not only on the date of sale and suit, but also throughout the pendency of the proceedings, because an appeal is a continuation of the original action. Where a statutory amendment takes away the co-owner's right of pre-emption during the appeal and confines the remedy to tenants, the pre-emption suit becomes non-maintainable at the appellate stage. The supervening change in law was treated as decisive, and the pre-emption claim failed once the statutory basis for that right was withdrawn. en-us Wed, 24 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Sep 2018 14:45:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275291 A pre-emption claim must be supported by a subsisting right and remedy not only on the date of sale and suit, but also throughout the pendency of the proceedings, because an appeal is a continuation of the original action. Where a statutory amendment takes away the co-owner's right of pre-emption during the appeal and confines the remedy to tenants, the pre-emption suit becomes non-maintainable at the appellate stage. The supervening change in law was treated as decisive, and the pre-emption claim failed once the statutory basis for that right was withdrawn. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 24 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275291