<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1729 - Karnataka High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275290</link>
    <description>The High Court confirmed an interim order directing the Debts Recovery Tribunal to expeditiously consider and dispose of applications filed by petitioners seeking relief against specific respondents. The Court emphasized the need for the Tribunal to adhere to the law in its decision-making process. The interim order was upheld to protect the petitioners&#039; rights until the Tribunal&#039;s final decision. The Court clarified that certain directions sought in earlier applications would not be entertained by the High Court, instructing the petitioners to address any remaining grievances before the Tribunal. Ultimately, the petitions were disposed of in line with these directives, leading to the resolution of the pending applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2018 14:40:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535994" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1729 - Karnataka High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275290</link>
      <description>The High Court confirmed an interim order directing the Debts Recovery Tribunal to expeditiously consider and dispose of applications filed by petitioners seeking relief against specific respondents. The Court emphasized the need for the Tribunal to adhere to the law in its decision-making process. The interim order was upheld to protect the petitioners&#039; rights until the Tribunal&#039;s final decision. The Court clarified that certain directions sought in earlier applications would not be entertained by the High Court, instructing the petitioners to address any remaining grievances before the Tribunal. Ultimately, the petitions were disposed of in line with these directives, leading to the resolution of the pending applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275290</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>