https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275289 An arbitral award is directly executable as a decree under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and need not first be made a rule of court under the earlier regime. Territorial jurisdiction for execution depends on where the judgment debtors or attachable assets are situated, so the court handling a Section 34 challenge does not become the decree-transmitting court. On that basis, the request for a precept or transfer of execution was declined, and the decree holder was left to pursue execution before the competent court at Bangalore. en-us Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Sep 2018 14:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275289 An arbitral award is directly executable as a decree under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and need not first be made a rule of court under the earlier regime. Territorial jurisdiction for execution depends on where the judgment debtors or attachable assets are situated, so the court handling a Section 34 challenge does not become the decree-transmitting court. On that basis, the request for a precept or transfer of execution was declined, and the decree holder was left to pursue execution before the competent court at Bangalore. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275289