<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (7) TMI 360 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275287</link>
    <description>A contract for sale of immovable property does not by itself transfer title, create an interest in the property, or amount to a conveyance for stamp duty purposes merely because possession or consideration may have passed. The document dated 16 October 1984 was treated as an agreement to sell because it contemplated a future conveyance after title verification and other formalities. The 1985 Explanation to Item 25 of Schedule I to the Bombay Stamp Act, which deems certain possession-backed agreements to be conveyances, was held to operate only prospectively from 9 December 1985 and could not apply to an earlier transaction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2018 13:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535986" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (7) TMI 360 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275287</link>
      <description>A contract for sale of immovable property does not by itself transfer title, create an interest in the property, or amount to a conveyance for stamp duty purposes merely because possession or consideration may have passed. The document dated 16 October 1984 was treated as an agreement to sell because it contemplated a future conveyance after title verification and other formalities. The 1985 Explanation to Item 25 of Schedule I to the Bombay Stamp Act, which deems certain possession-backed agreements to be conveyances, was held to operate only prospectively from 9 December 1985 and could not apply to an earlier transaction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275287</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>