<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1547 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367811</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that the amounts collected by the assessee towards refundable plot booking advances were capital receipts, not revenue receipts. Consequently, expenses related to these advances could not be considered as revenue expenditures. The Tribunal also affirmed the applicability of Section 40(a)(ia) and the assessment under Section 144, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2018 08:49:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535927" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1547 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367811</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that the amounts collected by the assessee towards refundable plot booking advances were capital receipts, not revenue receipts. Consequently, expenses related to these advances could not be considered as revenue expenditures. The Tribunal also affirmed the applicability of Section 40(a)(ia) and the assessment under Section 144, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367811</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>