<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1534 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367798</link>
    <description>The Tribunal reduced the addition of 30% of bogus purchases made by the assessee to 12.5%, partially allowing the appeal. The Tribunal considered the assessee&#039;s explanation of corresponding sales and lack of VAT numbers for parties, along with acceptable gross profit on sales, in determining the reduction. The decision emphasizes the significance of maintaining proper documentation and transparency in business dealings to prevent unfavorable tax consequences.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2018 16:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535914" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1534 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367798</link>
      <description>The Tribunal reduced the addition of 30% of bogus purchases made by the assessee to 12.5%, partially allowing the appeal. The Tribunal considered the assessee&#039;s explanation of corresponding sales and lack of VAT numbers for parties, along with acceptable gross profit on sales, in determining the reduction. The decision emphasizes the significance of maintaining proper documentation and transparency in business dealings to prevent unfavorable tax consequences.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367798</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>