https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367789 The Bombay High Court dealt with a challenge to a revenue communication demanding repayment of amounts said to have been wrongly obtained under an export incentive scheme. The revenue stated that it would not initiate recovery or give effect to the communication until the proposed show-cause notice was adjudicated, and the Court accepted that statement. In view of that assurance, the Court found no basis for interference at that stage. It further clarified that no coercive recovery could be taken before adjudication, although any voluntary payment would not be restrained. en-us Fri, 21 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Sep 2018 08:47:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367789 The Bombay High Court dealt with a challenge to a revenue communication demanding repayment of amounts said to have been wrongly obtained under an export incentive scheme. The revenue stated that it would not initiate recovery or give effect to the communication until the proposed show-cause notice was adjudicated, and the Court accepted that statement. In view of that assurance, the Court found no basis for interference at that stage. It further clarified that no coercive recovery could be taken before adjudication, although any voluntary payment would not be restrained. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 21 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367789