<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1521 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367785</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, stating that the questions raised did not give rise to any substantial questions of law. The decision was based on the interpretation of relevant case law, circulars, and previous court judgments, ultimately supporting the classification of the services provided by the Respondent as falling under the Export of Service Rules, 2005.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2019 12:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535898" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1521 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367785</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, stating that the questions raised did not give rise to any substantial questions of law. The decision was based on the interpretation of relevant case law, circulars, and previous court judgments, ultimately supporting the classification of the services provided by the Respondent as falling under the Export of Service Rules, 2005.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367785</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>