https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367783 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the rejection of a refund claim for service tax paid on input services for export of logistics services. The Tribunal found that the appellant's activities facilitated the re-export of goods, constituting an export of service. Additionally, the interpretation of Rule 9 of POPR, 2012 supported the appellant's claim as the services were provided to a foreign entity, making it an export of service. The appellant was deemed eligible for a refund of cenvat credit on input services used for export of logistic services, overturning the initial rejection. en-us Tue, 25 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Apr 2019 12:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367783 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the rejection of a refund claim for service tax paid on input services for export of logistics services. The Tribunal found that the appellant's activities facilitated the re-export of goods, constituting an export of service. Additionally, the interpretation of Rule 9 of POPR, 2012 supported the appellant's claim as the services were provided to a foreign entity, making it an export of service. The appellant was deemed eligible for a refund of cenvat credit on input services used for export of logistic services, overturning the initial rejection. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 25 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367783