https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367777 The Tribunal upheld the Department's decision to invoke the extended period of limitation for the service tax demand due to the appellant's willful suppression of material facts and failure to declare income received. The appellant's argument of regular filing of returns and cooperation with the Department did not negate the finding of suppression. The confusion regarding incentives was clarified later, but the appellant did not seek clarification earlier. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the Department's stance on invoking the extended period of limitation. en-us Thu, 30 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Sep 2018 08:47:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367777 The Tribunal upheld the Department's decision to invoke the extended period of limitation for the service tax demand due to the appellant's willful suppression of material facts and failure to declare income received. The appellant's argument of regular filing of returns and cooperation with the Department did not negate the finding of suppression. The confusion regarding incentives was clarified later, but the appellant did not seek clarification earlier. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the Department's stance on invoking the extended period of limitation. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 30 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367777