<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1509 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367773</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, ruling that no show cause notice was required for the amount already paid by the appellant. The penalty on this portion was deemed unsustainable. The demand of Rs. 75,812 was set aside, and the case was remanded to the Original Authority for verification of Invoices supporting the Cenvat credit claim. The Original Authority was instructed to reassess the Rs. 75,812 demand based on verified documents and any additional evidence provided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2018 08:47:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535881" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1509 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367773</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, ruling that no show cause notice was required for the amount already paid by the appellant. The penalty on this portion was deemed unsustainable. The demand of Rs. 75,812 was set aside, and the case was remanded to the Original Authority for verification of Invoices supporting the Cenvat credit claim. The Original Authority was instructed to reassess the Rs. 75,812 demand based on verified documents and any additional evidence provided.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367773</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>