<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1508 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367772</link>
    <description>The appeal stemmed from a clerical error in assigning order numbers, leading to confusion and imposition of penalties. Despite sustaining some penalties through appeal stages, the final appeal favored the appellant due to the matter reaching finality in a previous Order-In-Appeal, rendering the impugned Order-In-Appeal infructuous and setting it aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2018 08:46:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535880" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1508 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367772</link>
      <description>The appeal stemmed from a clerical error in assigning order numbers, leading to confusion and imposition of penalties. Despite sustaining some penalties through appeal stages, the final appeal favored the appellant due to the matter reaching finality in a previous Order-In-Appeal, rendering the impugned Order-In-Appeal infructuous and setting it aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367772</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>