<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1506 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367770</link>
    <description>The appeal was filed against an Order-in-Appeal dated 27/01/2015 regarding a payment made to a foreign legal firm for arbitration services, resulting in a demand for Service Tax. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding no intent to evade tax payment and the demand being outside the normal limitation period. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed on 10/08/2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2018 08:46:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535877" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1506 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367770</link>
      <description>The appeal was filed against an Order-in-Appeal dated 27/01/2015 regarding a payment made to a foreign legal firm for arbitration services, resulting in a demand for Service Tax. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding no intent to evade tax payment and the demand being outside the normal limitation period. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed on 10/08/2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367770</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>