<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1497 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367761</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed and confirmed by the Commissioner of Central Tax (Appeals) in a case where the appellant challenged the liability to service tax under the reverse charge mechanism. The Tribunal emphasized that the transaction was revenue-neutral, and the appellant&#039;s payment of duty and interest upon notification demonstrated compliance. Referring to legal precedents, the Tribunal found the lower appellate authority&#039;s order unsustainable, leading to the penalty being overturned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2018 08:46:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535867" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1497 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367761</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed and confirmed by the Commissioner of Central Tax (Appeals) in a case where the appellant challenged the liability to service tax under the reverse charge mechanism. The Tribunal emphasized that the transaction was revenue-neutral, and the appellant&#039;s payment of duty and interest upon notification demonstrated compliance. Referring to legal precedents, the Tribunal found the lower appellate authority&#039;s order unsustainable, leading to the penalty being overturned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367761</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>