<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 37 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14585</link>
    <description>The High Court of Delhi upheld the decision to allow depreciation on machinery not actively used during the assessment year 1971-72. The court emphasized that depreciation aims to compensate for wear and tear on assets used in business, including passive utilization. It noted that depreciation is essential to accurately reflect business profits by considering asset deterioration. The court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, stating that maintaining machinery for potential use justifies depreciation allowance, despite lack of active use during the specific year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 13:04:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53585" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 37 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14585</link>
      <description>The High Court of Delhi upheld the decision to allow depreciation on machinery not actively used during the assessment year 1971-72. The court emphasized that depreciation aims to compensate for wear and tear on assets used in business, including passive utilization. It noted that depreciation is essential to accurately reflect business profits by considering asset deterioration. The court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, stating that maintaining machinery for potential use justifies depreciation allowance, despite lack of active use during the specific year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14585</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>