<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 745 - CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275265</link>
    <description>The appeal against the rejection of an RTI request for information about a company&#039;s status, directors, and pending cases was dismissed. The court upheld the decision that the information was already in the public domain and access was available for a predetermined fee. It was ruled that public authorities have the right to determine the price for voluntarily disclosed information, and pricing access differently from rates under the RTI Act is within their discretion. The appellant&#039;s argument that denial of information was illegal under the RTI Act was rejected, affirming the requirement for payment to access the requested information.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2018 13:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535804" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 745 - CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275265</link>
      <description>The appeal against the rejection of an RTI request for information about a company&#039;s status, directors, and pending cases was dismissed. The court upheld the decision that the information was already in the public domain and access was available for a predetermined fee. It was ruled that public authorities have the right to determine the price for voluntarily disclosed information, and pricing access differently from rates under the RTI Act is within their discretion. The appellant&#039;s argument that denial of information was illegal under the RTI Act was rejected, affirming the requirement for payment to access the requested information.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275265</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>