<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1667 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275261</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court addressed the appeal regarding the validity of a stop work notice and height restriction on Wing &#039;C&#039;. A settlement limited the Public Parking Lot to ground + 4 upper floors and three-level basements, with captive parking from the 5th to 13th floors in Wing &#039;C&#039;. The Court emphasized that this settlement did not invalidate the Municipal Circular. Additionally, the Court clarified the correlation between DCR 23 and DCR 38(34), highlighted the need for proper supervision in granting exemptions from DCR 31(1), recommended assessing the impact of additional FSI on traffic, and mandated maintaining adequate fire safety mechanisms for high-rise buildings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2018 12:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535787" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1667 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275261</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court addressed the appeal regarding the validity of a stop work notice and height restriction on Wing &#039;C&#039;. A settlement limited the Public Parking Lot to ground + 4 upper floors and three-level basements, with captive parking from the 5th to 13th floors in Wing &#039;C&#039;. The Court emphasized that this settlement did not invalidate the Municipal Circular. Additionally, the Court clarified the correlation between DCR 23 and DCR 38(34), highlighted the need for proper supervision in granting exemptions from DCR 31(1), recommended assessing the impact of additional FSI on traffic, and mandated maintaining adequate fire safety mechanisms for high-rise buildings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275261</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>