<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1473 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367737</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the reassessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 1998-1999. The Court found that the reassessment was time-barred as there was no evidence of non-disclosure by the Assessee, who had fully disclosed all material facts in the return. The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, ruling in favor of the Assessee and emphasizing the importance of full disclosure by the taxpayer. No costs were awarded in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2018 08:25:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535777" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1473 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367737</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the reassessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 1998-1999. The Court found that the reassessment was time-barred as there was no evidence of non-disclosure by the Assessee, who had fully disclosed all material facts in the return. The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, ruling in favor of the Assessee and emphasizing the importance of full disclosure by the taxpayer. No costs were awarded in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367737</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>