<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1462 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367726</link>
    <description>A primary agricultural credit society classified under Kerala co-operative law remains eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) despite section 80P(4), because its State-law status could not be displaced and the cited Supreme Court ruling was factually distinguishable. Interest earned on sub-treasury deposits was also held to qualify for deduction, as the deposits formed part of the society&#039;s banking/business deployment and the income retained a business character. Rental income, however, was held outside section 80P because income from house property does not fall within the specified deduction clauses. The trade-income issue was remitted for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2018 08:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535766" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1462 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367726</link>
      <description>A primary agricultural credit society classified under Kerala co-operative law remains eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) despite section 80P(4), because its State-law status could not be displaced and the cited Supreme Court ruling was factually distinguishable. Interest earned on sub-treasury deposits was also held to qualify for deduction, as the deposits formed part of the society&#039;s banking/business deployment and the income retained a business character. Rental income, however, was held outside section 80P because income from house property does not fall within the specified deduction clauses. The trade-income issue was remitted for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367726</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>