<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1456 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367720</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the winding up petition based on a foreign decree, citing issues with service of summons and the need for detailed examination in execution proceedings for allegations of fraud and legality of services. The petitioner was granted liberty to approach the executing court to test the validity of the decree after recording evidence. The court emphasized that its findings were specific to the present petition and would not impact future proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2018 08:24:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535760" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1456 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367720</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the winding up petition based on a foreign decree, citing issues with service of summons and the need for detailed examination in execution proceedings for allegations of fraud and legality of services. The petitioner was granted liberty to approach the executing court to test the validity of the decree after recording evidence. The court emphasized that its findings were specific to the present petition and would not impact future proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367720</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>