<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1449 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367713</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by a Special Purpose Vehicle Company challenging the denial of cenvat credit on general insurance services used for plant and machinery in business activities. It held that the exclusion clause &#039;(BA)&#039; under the Cenvat Credit Rules applied only to insurance services for motor vehicles, not for plant and machinery used in providing output services. The Tribunal emphasized that general insurance services related to business activities fell within the definition of input service, overturning the Revenue&#039;s decision. The appeal was partially allowed, with a small demand for service tax not pressed and no penalty imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2018 08:23:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535753" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1449 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367713</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by a Special Purpose Vehicle Company challenging the denial of cenvat credit on general insurance services used for plant and machinery in business activities. It held that the exclusion clause &#039;(BA)&#039; under the Cenvat Credit Rules applied only to insurance services for motor vehicles, not for plant and machinery used in providing output services. The Tribunal emphasized that general insurance services related to business activities fell within the definition of input service, overturning the Revenue&#039;s decision. The appeal was partially allowed, with a small demand for service tax not pressed and no penalty imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367713</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>