https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367711 Service tax demand under the category of Commercial Coaching or Training was upheld on merits, following the view taken in the assessee's earlier case. The text also states that the assessee was entitled to cum-duty price benefit for re-quantification of the demand, and the penalties were set aside in line with the earlier binding view. The matter was therefore remanded for fresh computation after allowing cum-duty adjustment, while the substantive liability remained confirmed. en-us Thu, 23 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Sep 2018 08:23:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367711 Service tax demand under the category of Commercial Coaching or Training was upheld on merits, following the view taken in the assessee's earlier case. The text also states that the assessee was entitled to cum-duty price benefit for re-quantification of the demand, and the penalties were set aside in line with the earlier binding view. The matter was therefore remanded for fresh computation after allowing cum-duty adjustment, while the substantive liability remained confirmed. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 23 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367711