<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1444 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367708</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the classification of services as &quot;Works Contract&quot; and setting aside the demands for the period before 01/06/2007. The Tribunal also accepted the assessee&#039;s argument for quantification of tax liability based on the nature of services, remanding the matter for re-quantification. The decision aimed at ensuring a fair assessment of tax liability, considering legal principles and precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2018 08:23:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535748" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1444 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367708</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the classification of services as &quot;Works Contract&quot; and setting aside the demands for the period before 01/06/2007. The Tribunal also accepted the assessee&#039;s argument for quantification of tax liability based on the nature of services, remanding the matter for re-quantification. The decision aimed at ensuring a fair assessment of tax liability, considering legal principles and precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367708</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>