<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1440 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367704</link>
    <description>Notification No. 70/2003-C.E. (N.T.) was treated as prospective and not merely clarificatory, so the challenge to entitlement to avail balance Cenvat credit before 15 September 2003 was not entertained. On penalty, the assessee&#039;s conduct was found to be based on a bona fide belief, and no circumstances were shown to justify punitive action. The Tribunal was expected to follow the earlier comparable decision deleting penalty on similar facts. The penalty was therefore held unsustainable and was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2019 14:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535744" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1440 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367704</link>
      <description>Notification No. 70/2003-C.E. (N.T.) was treated as prospective and not merely clarificatory, so the challenge to entitlement to avail balance Cenvat credit before 15 September 2003 was not entertained. On penalty, the assessee&#039;s conduct was found to be based on a bona fide belief, and no circumstances were shown to justify punitive action. The Tribunal was expected to follow the earlier comparable decision deleting penalty on similar facts. The penalty was therefore held unsustainable and was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>