<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1436 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367700</link>
    <description>The case revolved around the disputed entitlement of the assessee to avail CENVAT credit on Superior Kerosene Oil (SKO), involving discrepancies in procurement and registration issues. The High Court emphasized the importance of factual considerations and ordered a reassessment by the Adjudicating Authority to determine the validity of the credit availed by the assessee. The matter was remitted for a fresh consideration, allowing both parties to present their contentions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2019 14:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535740" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1436 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367700</link>
      <description>The case revolved around the disputed entitlement of the assessee to avail CENVAT credit on Superior Kerosene Oil (SKO), involving discrepancies in procurement and registration issues. The High Court emphasized the importance of factual considerations and ordered a reassessment by the Adjudicating Authority to determine the validity of the credit availed by the assessee. The matter was remitted for a fresh consideration, allowing both parties to present their contentions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367700</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>