https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367696 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a 70-year-old individual seeking a declaration that his inherited property was not subject to any charge by the Central tax authorities. The court found that the respondents failed to provide evidence of outstanding dues or any order establishing liabilities against the petitioner's father. The property's acquisition history and the nature of communications from the tax authorities were insufficient to establish a charge on the property. Consequently, the court declared that there was no attachment by the tax authorities on the petitioner's property, allowing for the property's transfer without hindrance. en-us Thu, 10 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Sep 2018 10:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367696 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a 70-year-old individual seeking a declaration that his inherited property was not subject to any charge by the Central tax authorities. The court found that the respondents failed to provide evidence of outstanding dues or any order establishing liabilities against the petitioner's father. The property's acquisition history and the nature of communications from the tax authorities were insufficient to establish a charge on the property. Consequently, the court declared that there was no attachment by the tax authorities on the petitioner's property, allowing for the property's transfer without hindrance. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 10 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367696