<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1431 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367695</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the Order-in-Appeal allowing Cenvat Credit to the respondent for services of Commission Agents. The decision was supported by legal developments, Circulars, and Notifications clarifying the admissibility of Cenvat Credit on services of sale of goods on commission basis. The Tribunal relied on its previous decisions and decisions of other High Courts to affirm the admissibility of Cenvat Credit in similar circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2018 08:23:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535735" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1431 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367695</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the Order-in-Appeal allowing Cenvat Credit to the respondent for services of Commission Agents. The decision was supported by legal developments, Circulars, and Notifications clarifying the admissibility of Cenvat Credit on services of sale of goods on commission basis. The Tribunal relied on its previous decisions and decisions of other High Courts to affirm the admissibility of Cenvat Credit in similar circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367695</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>