https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367693 The Tribunal upheld the rejection of the Rectification of Mistake (ROM) application, emphasizing the department's obligation to comply with the order subjecting the refund claim to document verification. The Tribunal found the order purposeful, as it did not specify original or copy submission requirements for claiming refunds, aligning with precedents allowing submission of copies in case of misplaced originals. The ROM was dismissed, highlighting the importance of adherence to Tribunal orders and established legal principles by departmental authorities. en-us Fri, 31 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Sep 2018 08:22:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367693 The Tribunal upheld the rejection of the Rectification of Mistake (ROM) application, emphasizing the department's obligation to comply with the order subjecting the refund claim to document verification. The Tribunal found the order purposeful, as it did not specify original or copy submission requirements for claiming refunds, aligning with precedents allowing submission of copies in case of misplaced originals. The ROM was dismissed, highlighting the importance of adherence to Tribunal orders and established legal principles by departmental authorities. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 31 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367693