<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1422 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367686</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the ld CITA that the warehouses owned by the assessee fell within the exclusion clause of section 2(ea) of the Wealth Tax Act, and thus were not liable for wealth tax. The Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the deletion of the addition to net wealth in respect of the two warehouses was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2018 11:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535726" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1422 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367686</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the ld CITA that the warehouses owned by the assessee fell within the exclusion clause of section 2(ea) of the Wealth Tax Act, and thus were not liable for wealth tax. The Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the deletion of the addition to net wealth in respect of the two warehouses was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367686</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>