https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275249 The court partially allowed the writ petition challenging the assessment order for the years 2002-03. While finding that the respondent had complied with providing documents as per the court's directive, the failure to allow cross-examination of witnesses was deemed a breach. Consequently, the assessment order was set aside, and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration, with specific directions to allow cross-examination within a specified timeframe to rectify the non-compliance. The judgment underscored the importance of procedural fairness and adherence to court directives in tax assessment proceedings. en-us Wed, 07 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Sep 2018 08:21:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275249 The court partially allowed the writ petition challenging the assessment order for the years 2002-03. While finding that the respondent had complied with providing documents as per the court's directive, the failure to allow cross-examination of witnesses was deemed a breach. Consequently, the assessment order was set aside, and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration, with specific directions to allow cross-examination within a specified timeframe to rectify the non-compliance. The judgment underscored the importance of procedural fairness and adherence to court directives in tax assessment proceedings. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 07 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275249