<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1736 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275251</link>
    <description>The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the appeal filed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act due to a delay of 1731 days in filing the appeal. The court found the explanation provided for the delay unsatisfactory, emphasizing the importance of sufficient cause for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The court highlighted that the delay was attributed to the appellant learning about the dismissal only after other appeals were decided, which was not considered a valid ground for condonation. Consequently, both the application for condonation of delay and the main appeal were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2018 08:21:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535715" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1736 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275251</link>
      <description>The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the appeal filed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act due to a delay of 1731 days in filing the appeal. The court found the explanation provided for the delay unsatisfactory, emphasizing the importance of sufficient cause for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The court highlighted that the delay was attributed to the appellant learning about the dismissal only after other appeals were decided, which was not considered a valid ground for condonation. Consequently, both the application for condonation of delay and the main appeal were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275251</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>